Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.



The New Gravity intro
Posted:
Oct 26, 2011 10:59 PM


The Nrw Dravity Intro johnreed We used the balance scale to give us weight for 6000 years and for 6000 years we believed that heavy objects fall faster than lighter objects. So when Galileo showed that all objects fall at the same rate when dropped at the same time from the same height we were amazed and we have remained amazed for 450 years. Where we place a balance scale is immaterial to the function of the balance scale (as long as it is placed in a frame within which it can operate). Wherever we place it the magnitude of the acceleration [g] as a factor of the product weight [mg], will be the same on each pan regardless of the mass magnitudes placed on the pans. So when we define an object in units of weight [mg], the only quantity we are comparing on the balance scale is the quantity of mass [m], since acceleration [g] is a consequence of location. This uniform action [g] on each pan enables us to compare nonuniform mass resistance on the balance scale. That's pretty simple isn't it? So you might wonder why I bother to point it out. Since what is called gravitational acceleration [g] is a consequence of location (and not a consequence of mass [m] ) all objects MUST fall at the rate of [g]. Further, if [g] was not a consequence of location then mass [m] and acceleration [g] could not be combined into the product called weight [mg]. In such a case the balance scale would only give us weight as [w]. However if that were the case we could never have developed. Nonetheless we have engaged in extensive research to verify that all objects fall at the same rate, independent of their mass [m] when dropped at the same time from the same height (in a vacuum). I have made it easier to reference my supporting work by creating a Google Science and Technology Group titled: "The Least Action Consistent Universe and the Mathematics". Currently it contains Sections 1 through 9 for reference. The many subsections and work prior to 2007 has not been included. I will develop it further as I have the time and gain familiarity with the venue. Meanwhile my more recent work is available for public review to all, and open to criticism and discussion by any person who joins the group. The latter is a condition established by Google and newsgroups in general. I provide information. I seek no recruits. However, there are no restrictions or requirements to join. Current web address: http://groups.google.com/group/thejohnreed johnreed



