Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Faster than the Speed of Light?
Replies: 33   Last Post: Nov 12, 2011 8:03 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
admformeto

Posts: 10
Registered: 10/6/11
Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
Posted: Nov 5, 2011 5:46 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply



"xxein" <xxein@att.net> wrote in message
news:11e96c70-f3e9-4035-a49a-418a39807f97@r7g2000vbg.googlegroups.com...
> On Nov 4, 12:14 pm, Shubee <e.shu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I can't get over the tremendous amount of propaganda that physicists
>> insist on inserting in their reporting of a probably irrelevant
>> discrepancy in an extraordinarily difficult measurement that is off by
>> 2/1000 of 1%.
>>
>> Why all the
>> hoopla?http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/faster-than-the-speed-of-light/

>
> xxein: The physic is perfect as it is. It is our understanding and
> measure of it that is wrong. Did you think that an understanding and
> measurement could change that?
>
> Why do you think that Newton, Kepler and Lorentz are so precise in
> formulas? Some Eistein came along and tried to change that into some
> shortcut of math. Some shorcut, huh? More math than ever.
>
> I don't simply blame him for that. But he put it into a concept that
> was even more paradoxical than Newton, Kepler and Lorentz, together (NK
> +L). I realize that Lorentz didn't offer a gravity. But he was the
> most important foundation of Einstein's SR.
>
> Then Einstein wanted to extend that to include gravity (GR). But he
> did that out of math. He manipulated these pure formulas (NK+L) into
> his own belief. Everybody fell for it because they thought that his
> math was supreme at that time.
>
> So why do we have different and conflicting theories about this physic
> we are in? It is because concepts can employ different sorts of
> mathematical usages. A math, by itself, cannot explain anything
> except itself. 2+2=4? Great. It helps you count existational
> things.
>
> Did you ever consider why there is a gravity and how it affects the
> speed of light? Not up to it, are you? So why do you post here?


Photon is mass-less and the gravity force field has no effect on it at all.
See the law of superposition.
Surface or edge refraction of light is what Einstein used as prove that
gravity affects light.




Date Subject Author
11/4/11
Read Faster than the Speed of Light?
Shubee
11/4/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
jon car
11/4/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
admformeto
11/4/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
PD
11/4/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
UpChunky
11/4/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
Brian Q. Hutchings
11/5/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
glbrad01
11/5/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
Kurt Bashwitz
11/8/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
Brian Q. Hutchings
11/10/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
Byron Forbes
11/10/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
Byron Forbes
11/10/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
PD
11/4/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
admformeto
11/4/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
dlzc@aol.com \(formerly\)
11/4/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
Kurt Bashwitz
11/4/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
dlzc@aol.com \(formerly\)
11/5/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
Kurt Bashwitz
11/5/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
dlzc@aol.com \(formerly\)
11/6/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
Kurt Bashwitz
11/8/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
Kurt Bashwitz
11/4/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
eric gisse
11/4/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
Shubee
11/4/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
xxein
11/4/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
Brian Q. Hutchings
11/4/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
GogoJF
11/5/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
Brian Q. Hutchings
11/5/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
admformeto
11/5/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
PD
11/8/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
Brian Q. Hutchings
11/10/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
james thomas
11/11/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
admformeto
11/12/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
james thomas
11/7/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
james thomas
11/12/11
Read Re: Faster than the Speed of Light?
Dono

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2013. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.