Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.



Re: Exchanging the order of summation
Posted:
Nov 9, 2011 11:08 AM


In article <d76d43c30a634c5cb29e6ab44da4d4e9@CITESHT4.ad.uillinois.edu>, John Washburn <Math@WashburnResearch.org> wrote:
> Are there conditions other than uniform convergence or absolut > convergence, which permit the order of summation to interchanged?
A simple example to consider is this one: f(n,n)=1, f(n,n+1)=1, for all n, and everything else 0. Interchanged sums are not equal.
> > I have a double summation over n = 1 to \infty and q= 1 to \infty of > the summand f(n,q). The limit processess are q first, then n, but i > would like to evaluate n first then q. If it matters f(n,q) is finite > and real for positive integers, n and q. > > I have sum with a definite when there is a single limit process > involved. Namely, I have two nondecreasing functions g(Q) and h(Q) > and a well define limit as Q increases without bound: > > limit_{Q \to \infty} sum_{n=1}^{g(Q)} sum_{q=1}^{g(Q)} = K. > > I seems to me I am very close to the FubiniTonelli theorem and that > if the double summation with a single limit process has a finite limit > the iterated sum has the same finite limit regardless of the order of > summation. > > Or is the proper conclusion that if a finite, limit exists, then all > three limits are the same. No guarantee that a finite limit exist, > jsut that if it does all three limit processes lead to the same value. > > So my question in another form is this: > Is the existence of a finite value of the double sum using a single > limit process (functions of Q), sufficient to permit the interchanging > the order of the limit processes; q tends to infinity and n tending to > infinity? > > Thanks for any time you might give to this question. > John Washburn



