Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Software » comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica

Topic: LinearProgramming[]
Replies: 3   Last Post: Dec 11, 2011 3:03 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Virgil Stokes

Posts: 77
Registered: 3/16/06
Re: LinearProgramming[]
Posted: Dec 10, 2011 6:45 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 09-Dec-2011 11:58, 道 厚 wrote:
> We know all constraints in LinearProgramming[] involve ">=" or "<=".
>
> How can I solve the following problem with LinearProgramming[]:
>
> Assuming x+2y-z>0,x+y-z>=60,y+2z>12,x>0,y>0 and z>1
>
> we want to get the minimum of 2x+3y+4z in the abrove constraints.
>
> Note that there are ">" other than">=" in the constraints we have
> given.
>

If an LP problem has a unique optimal solution then it must lie along the
boundary of a polyhedron formed by the constraints. This implies that strictly
less than (<) or strictly greater than (>) constraints do not fit into a LP
problem formulation; i.e. the solution is no longer guaranteed to be along a
boundary. This means that the function LinearProgramming is not applicable for
"<" and ">" constraints.

I believe that you will find that if these strict constraints have any effect on
an optimization problem, the effect will be that there is no unique solution to
the problem --- this applies to both linear and nonlinear optimization problems.
Thus, I suggest that you try to reformulate your problem such that it can be
written without any strict constraints. Here is your problem reformulated with
">" replaced by ">=".

m = {{1, 2, -1}, {1, 1, -1}, {0, 1, 2}};
b = {0, 60, 12}; s = {1, 1, 1};
c = {2, 3, 4};
bs = Transpose[{b, s}];
LinearProgramming[c, m, bs, {0, 0, 1}]

which gives {51,10,1} as the solution to,

minimize 2x + 3y + 4z
subject to:
x + 2y - z >= 0
x + y - z >= 60
y + 2z >= 12
x >= 0, y >= 0, z >= 1

Note, two of the constraints (6 in total) in your original problem are not
satisfied. It might useful for you to plot the polyhedron formed by these
constraints --- graphical analysis can be enlightening.




Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.