Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum


Math Forum
 Ask Dr. Math
 Discussions
 Internet Newsletter
 MathTools
 Problems of the Week
 Teacher2Teacher
 Teacher Exchange
 Workshops

Search All of the Math Forum:
Browse our Internet Mathematics Library

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: POLL: Is Cantor's Theorem 1st Order Logic or 2nd Order Logic?
Replies: 11   Last Post: Dec 24, 2011 3:55 PM

Advanced Search
Reply to this Topic Reply to this Topic

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
patmpowers@gmail.com

Posts: 34
Registered: 5/19/07
Re: POLL: Is Cantor's Theorem 1st Order Logic or 2nd Order Logic?
Posted: Dec 23, 2011 7:55 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Dec 23, 5:53 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Cantor's theorem is an assertion in the second-order language of
> > arithmetic. It can be proved in RCA_0.
>
> I DON'T GIVE A FUCK!
>
> THE POLL IS ABOUT FOL OR 2ND ORDER LOGIC!
>
> CAPICHE?
>
> YOU JUST FUCKED THE POLL NOW EVERY FUCKING SHITHEAD IN SCI.MATH WILL
> CARRY ON OBLIVIOUS TO THE MOST STUPID MISTAKE IN ALL HISTORY OF
> MATHEMATICS
>
> GO FUCK YOURSELF YOU IDIOT
> AND DON'T FUCK UP MY POSTS WITH YOU BULLSHIT COPOUTS!
>
> IS THE FORMULA IN FIRST ORDER LOGIC
>
> YES OR NO YOU LYING SHITHEAD

A classic sci.physics post.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2013. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.