Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Software » comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica

Topic: Compiling Runge-kutta
Replies: 4   Last Post: Mar 28, 2012 1:35 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Oliver Ruebenkoenig

Posts: 237
Registered: 6/28/08
Re: Compiling Runge-kutta
Posted: Mar 23, 2012 2:32 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply


Joao,

it's hard to say what the issue is without seeing the code. I suspect you
get more answers if you actually post your code. Please make sure it is
complete and easy to copy and past.

Oliver



On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Joao wrote:

> Hi there, I've been going through this thread (Vector Runge-Kutta ODE solver with compilation?) and I would like to know if anyone could give me an opinion on the problem I have.
>
> Basically I am using the same runge-kutta 4 taken from Jason Cantarella's page than Dmitry was, but I am using the NestList version.
>
> I really need to speed up this algorithm. When I did one of the examples you provided on this thread, the compiled version solved it at a duration of 7% of the non compiled version which was pretty cool.
>
> My problem was that when I tried to use it on the work I'm doing the compiled and non compiled versions took the same time. My guess is that the compiled version wasn't able to compute and it returned to the non-compiled version.
>
> At this moment I don't know if I'm doing something wrong or if the nature of the RHS of the functions I'm using prevents the compiled algorithm to work in a proper way.
>
> I can send the code if necessary.
>
> Nevertheless, I may advance that my RHS is a system of 6 ODE (hamiltonian), these ODE call other functions (controls). These last functions (controls) are coded in a module box. Inside that box are some implicit functions in R1 (hence a newton algorithm is called) and there is also a switch - if a given condition is above a threshold the control box assumes one form, bellow that threshold another form is assumed. After all these calculations inside the control box it returns simply a vector of order 3.
>
> I would appreciate any help. At the moment I do not know if this is feasible with Compile or not. Maybe I have to put all this different boxes inside a compile?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Joao Pereira
>
>





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.