did
Posts:
71
Registered:
9/14/05
|
|
Re: Inversion Lerch Phi
Posted:
May 5, 2012 12:35 AM
|
|
On 5/4/12 7:29 PM, clicliclic@freenet.de wrote:
>
> clicliclic@freenet.de schrieb:
>>
>> Did schrieb:
>>>
>>> On 4/26/12 4:55 PM, clicliclic@freenet.de wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [...] So Did should have had a chance to receive the corrected
>>>> formula too.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, I got it at once. Thanks.
>>> BTW, how would you like to be cited if
>>> I use your formula in a publication?
>>>
>>
>> [...] For citation, you may simply refer to a Thu, 19 Apr 2012
>> 19:09:34 +0200 "proposal" by sci.math.symbolic poster "Martin". A
>> private e-mail to<didier.oslo@hotmail.com> will provide more
>> information, provided that mailbox exists.
>>
>
> Just a trifle: My private message (of Fri, 27 Apr 2012 18:56:20 +0200)
> didn't bounce, so that mailbox is likely to exist.
>
> Martin.
Martin,
Yes, this mailbox indeed exist, but
I never got any email from you.
Did
|
|
