Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.num-analysis.independent

Topic: A Few FFTs Short of MPC
Replies: 26   Last Post: Apr 17, 2012 3:29 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
BretCahill@peoplepc.com

Posts: 487
Registered: 6/24/08
A Few FFTs Short of MPC
Posted: Apr 15, 2012 11:20 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

What has been and is being called "matched filtering" might better be
called "a few steps short of complete match filtering" [which has the
often desirable effect of _adding_ in some low pass filtering].

Noise is often at higher frequencies so no one is going to complain
too much about this fortuitous get-more-by-doing-less situation.
North didn't have time to be mathematically politically correct during
a war, certainly not before machines costing less than a few days pay
could calculate a dozen 1024 FFTs in seconds.

Mathematicians, however, aren't satisfied with "well it woOOorks"
jerry rigs. Since there isn't any major war going on recovering the
original signal can now be considered, if only as a matter of form.
This is easy to do in the frequency domain. Just take the square root
of the product of signal X template. Excel makes this operation on
complex numbers easy with IMSQRT.

Now you can see the results of the frequency & phase angle matching
without the seemingly inherent low pass filtering effects obscuring
the match.

Engineers like to get lucky with Fortuna but they also like dedicated
operations. Do the _complete_ matched filter. After the original
signal is recovered _then_ you add in whatever additional filtering
you think is necessary.

Even for signal detection recovering the original signal will often be
a better route. What would be easier to detect? A triangle or a
square wave?


Bret Cahill


"The mind invents things more easily than words. That's why so many
bad terms come into existence."

-- Tocqueville





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.