The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: 0^0=1
Replies: 3   Last Post: May 8, 2012 3:52 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Jussi Piitulainen

Posts: 355
Registered: 12/12/04
Re: 0^0=1
Posted: May 8, 2012 3:52 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Ross writes:

> Defining 0^0 = 1 is convenient in some situations, e.g. the Binomial
> Theorem cannot calculate the probability that you get zero successes
> in zero trials unless you define 0^0 = 1.
> However, going from "it is sometimes convenient" to define 0^0 = 1
> to insisting that this should be a general definition seems a bit of
> an unjustified leap.

It is convenient generally, not just sometimes.

> Particularly if you use b^(n+1) = b^n / b as your basis for claiming
> that b^0 = 1 and b^-1 = 1/b, when that clearly doesn't apply when b
> = 0.

That is not used as a justification for defining 0^0. It is used as a
justification for leaving 0^0 undefined, even though it does not apply
in that case.

Date Subject Author
Read Re: 0^0=1
Jesse F. Hughes
Read Re: 0^0=1
Ross Clement
Read Re: 0^0=1
Jussi Piitulainen

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.