Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Professional Associations » ncsm-members

Topic: [ncsm-members] Math Teaching Often Doesn't Fit With New Standards
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
Jerry P. Becker

Posts: 13,397
Registered: 12/3/04
[ncsm-members] Math Teaching Often Doesn't Fit With New Standards
Posted: May 14, 2012 3:21 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply
att1.html (6.9 K)

******************************
From Education Week [American Education's Newspaper of Record],
Wednesday, May 9, 2012, Volume 31, Issue 30, p. 7. See
http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2012/04/24/30common.h31.html?qs=math+teaching+often+doesn%27t+fit+with+common-core+standards
******************************
Math Teaching Often Doesn't Fit With New Standards

Topics broached at unprescribed grade levels

By Catherine Gewertz

Atlanta

Many mathematics teachers are teaching topics at higher or lower
grade levels-and for more years-than the Common Core State Standards
recommend, according to preliminary results from new research.

That finding suggests that when the new standards are fully
implemented, many math teachers could face significant shifts in what
they will teach.

The information is part of a research effort led by William H.
Schmidt, a Michigan State University professor who is widely known
for an influential 1996 study that found the typical course of study
in U.S. math was "a mile wide and an inch deep."

His new research, which does not yet have a release date, examines a
nationally representative group of more than 13,000 K-12 math
teachers and 600 district curriculum directors in more than 40
states. It seeks to gauge their readiness to put the common standards
in math, which have been adopted by 45 states and the District of
Columbia, into practice. Early results were presented at a conference
of the Council of Chief State School Officers here April 19.

Mr. Schmidt's team at Michigan State's Center for the Study of
Curriculum, in East Lansing, asked the curriculum directors when key
topics in the common-core math standards were first introduced, and
in what grade levels those topics continued to be taught.

They found that typical coverage of the topics in common-core
standards lags two to three years behind the grades envisioned in the
common core, and persists longer.

Key topics introduced in 2nd grade in the common standards, for
instance, are currently introduced between 1st and 3rd grades, the
study says. The variance was even wider in middle school: Topics that
the common core introduces in 6th grade are now introduced between
3rd and 8th grades, Mr. Schmidt's research shows.

Additionally, topics envisioned as unique to a given grade in the
common standards now persist for multiple years, the study found.
Focus topics of the standards at the 4th grade level, for instance,
show up in classrooms from 1st through 8th grades, according to the
research.

Gauging Attitudes

Teachers appear to be reluctant to shift the grade at which topics
are taught, the study's findings suggest. Only one-quarter said they
would drop a topic if the common standards specify that it be taught
at another grade level.

Responding to surveys and discussing the standards in focus groups,
math teachers overwhelmingly supported the standards, which emerged
two years ago from a project led by the CCSSO and the National
Governors Association. Nine in 10 of the teachers reported that they
had heard of the standards, and seven in 10 said they had read them.
Ninety percent said they liked the new learning guidelines.

"By and large, opposition to the common core is not coming from
teachers. They just want support to teach it," Leland Cogan, a
Michigan State University research associate who works with Mr.
Schmidt, told state representatives as he presented the preliminary
findings at the CCSSO gathering.

Nine in 10 of the K-6 teachers said they liked and would teach the
standards. That figure slipped to 85 percent in grades 7 and 8, and
to 82 percent in high school.

Nearly 8 percent of the teachers surveyed in grades 1-3 said they
didn't like the standards but would teach them anyway. Nine percent
of those in grades 4-6 said the same thing. Discontent correlated
with grade level: More than 13 percent of the math teachers in grades
7 and 8 said they didn't like the standards but would go ahead and
teach them. In high school, the figure was more than 16 percent.

Fewer than 1 percent of teachers at all grade levels said they "don't
like and won't teach" the standards.

Old vs. New

Other findings raise the question of whether teachers understand the
differences between their states' former standards and the new ones,
Mr. Schmidt said in an email. When they viewed sample topics for
their respective grades, eight in 10 reported that they reflect
"pretty much the same" content as their states' previous standards.

"The data suggest that most teachers do not recognize how difficult"
it will be to move from their states' former standards to the new
ones, Mr. Schmidt said.

"Given their willingness, I remain optimistic," he said, "but I
believe we have to make them aware of how different these standards
are and provide them with materials that both make them aware of the
differences and provide them with materials to help in the
implementation."

Large numbers of teachers feel unprepared to teach topics in the new
standards, the study found.

One-third reported that they had not taken part in any activity
designed to help them implement the new standards. And large
proportions-as low as 20 percent and as high as 75 percent-reported
feeling unprepared to teach some common-core math topics.

When asked to choose possible obstacles to putting the new standards
into practice, teachers put a lack of parent support (49.7 percent)
and the need for textbooks that support the standards (28.9 percent)
at the top of their lists. Concerns about state tests' alignment to
the material also was often named (28.8 percent), along with
students' difficulty learning the material (20 percent) and a "lack
of needed mathematics knowledge among teachers" (15 percent).

*******************************************
--
Jerry P. Becker
Dept. of Curriculum & Instruction
Southern Illinois University
625 Wham Drive
Mail Code 4610
Carbondale, IL 62901-4610
Phone: (618) 453-4241 [O]
(618) 457-8903 [H]
Fax: (618) 453-4244
E-mail: jbecker@siu.edu



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.