On Jun 23, 2:36 pm, mpc755 <mpc...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 23, 1:53 pm, Brad Guth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >http://aether.lbl.gov/image_all.html > > > Is it technically possible for a natural mono-directional jet of pure > > fusion to exist of any kind? > > > Obviously a rocket engine is offering only one exit jet of hot matter > > (or that of cold matter if using Acetone Peroxide propellent), but > > there's always a given reaction of acceleration and subsequent proper > > motion given to that item providing such rocket thrust. Is there > > still a Progenitor BH of sufficient mass at the beginning of our polar > > jet universe? (or was the PBH totally expended?) > > > I can fully go along with that conservative observation interpretation > > of yours, just like how I've been interpreting an image of Venus (aka > > Guth Venus) that seems to suggest that either the physical laws of > > geology have worked quite differently for that pressure-cooker planet, > > or that it took some added degree of naturally evolved or artificial > > intelligence (aka telerobotic machines) in order to make those > > extremely unusual hot rocks appear to have offered such a rational > > community like infrastructure. > > > ?Guth Venus? 1:1, plus 10x resample/enlargement of the area in > > question:https://picasaweb.google.com/102736204560337818634/BradGuth#slideshow... > > > Other thumbnail images, including mgn_c115s095_1.gif (225 m/pixel) > > http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/thumbnail_pages/venus_thumbnails.html > > Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles, Venus from Magellan Cycle 1 > > http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/html/object_page/mgn_c115s095_1.html > > http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif > > > http://groups.google.com/groups/search > > http://translate.google.com/# > > Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/?Guth Venus? > > What is the diameter of the Universal jet at the point where aether > condenses into matter? Is the Earth simply moving outward and away > from the Universal jet emission point or is there a Rindler horizon > which will cause the Earth to wind up back at the Universal jet > accretion disk where the Earth will once again be emitted into the > Universal jet? Is there an accretion disk associated with the > Universal jet? > > I think all the questions above are more likely to be answerable than > if there is another polar jet opposite the Universal jet we exist in.
Physics needs to get and remain balanced from the very get-go. You can't have only an outflux of positives without any negatives showing up somewhere.