The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: WM's Matheology S 030
Replies: 5   Last Post: Jun 27, 2012 5:38 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 554
Registered: 2/4/08
Re: WM's Matheology Fails Again!
Posted: Jun 26, 2012 9:52 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Jun 26, 9:34 pm, Virgil <> wrote:
> On Jun 24, 10:53 am, WM <> wrote:

> > Addition: Have you ever understood that there is no infinite sequence
> > (a_n) that defines its limit a?

> Actually every convergent sequence does,

> >You can see this by leaving out the
> > first n terms a_n - and that holds for every n.

> That every subsequence of a convergent  sequence also converges to the
> same limit value does not falsify the limit of the original sequence.
> Except possibly in WM's mathological miasmas.

> > (You cannot specify
> > any n such that the a_n would be required.

> That is just because no finite sequence is an infinite sequence.

It is of course also WM's favourite obfuscation, predicated on the
fuzzy meaning of "can be omitted". It's muddled thinking and
quantifier dyslexia at its best. The good professor seems on top of
his game these days.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.