Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology § 055
Replies: 15   Last Post: Jul 3, 2012 3:15 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de

Posts: 12,659
Registered: 1/29/05
Matheology § 055
Posted: Jul 1, 2012 4:44 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Matheology § 055

Gödel takes the paradoxes very seriously; they reveal to him "the
amazing fact that our logical intuitions are self-contradictory." This
attitude toward the paradoxes is of course at complete variance with
the view of Brouwer who blames the paradoxes not on some
transcendental logical intuition which deceives us, but on a gross
error inadvertently committed in the passage from finite to infinite
sets. I confess that in this respect I remain steadfastly on the side
of Brouwer.
[H. Weyl: "Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science", Princeton,
1949]
[Komaravolu Chandrasekharan: "Hermann Weyl, Gesammelte Abhandlungen,
Vol. IV", Springer (1968) p. 602]
[Hermann Weyl: "Philosophie der Mathematik und Naturwissenschaft",
Oldenbourg, 8. Aufl. (2009)]
http://www.oldenbourg-wissenschaftsverlag.de/olb/de/1.c.325917.de?_suche%5Bmode%5D=einfach&sv%5Bolb_vt%5D=Weyl

Regards, WM



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2013. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.