Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.



Re: HOPE RESEARCH PUBLISHED ON RIEMANNS HYPOTHESIS/ PRIME NUMBER
Posted:
Jul 5, 2012 11:18 AM


On Monday July 2, 2012 5:48 pm, (unknown) wrote: > Prime numbers 2012 J Am Sci 2012;8(7):329324 > > Complete solution to the halfline for Prime number divergence, so called Riemanns hypothesis which is a spiral (to be proven later). Remember Inverse 19. Your mathematics was dead long time ago > > Hope research "in the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ
I just read your article and it's amazing! I can't believe what I've read. I can't believe any serious journal would publish such crap!
There is no proof, only lists of numbers, the same lists you've been spamming for years. No description about how you choose the operations you applied. Even worse, you hide behind arguments like "This is a basic deduction of our 1:3 axiom mathematics, not discussed here because of the complexity". This IS the place to discuss such complexity and you avoid it. This means that a) you believe we're idiots or b) you don't know what you're talking about. I'd put my money on b).
I couldn't stop laughing when I read the part about the "nonoffset mathematical Pi value". This is to die for... You only demonstrate that you can be close to Pi, not that Pi is the value you showed.
I didn't know much about the Journal of American Science. From my point of view, this journal has no credibility.



