|
|
Re: Matheology § 062
Posted:
Jul 10, 2012 1:00 AM
|
|
WM wrote:
> On 9 Jul., 09:29, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > > > 21
>> > > > 2.1
>> > > > 432.1
>> > > > 43.21
>> > > > 6543.21
>> > > > 654.321
>> > 87654.321
>> > 8765.4321
>> > 1098765.4321
>> > 109876.54321
>> > 1211109876.54321
>> > 121110987.654321
>> > 1413121110987.654321
>> > 141312111098.7654321
>> > 1615141312111098.7654321
>> > 161514131211109.87654321
>> > 1817161514131211109.87654321
>> > 181716151413121110.987654321
>> > 2019181716151413121110.987654321
>> > 20191817161514131211.10987654321
>> > ...
>> > Oll Klear now?
>
>> > The sequence has the improper limit oo - in mathematics.
>>
>> as originally defined, only up through 8765.4321, subsequent terms were
>> sufficiently ambiguous to prohibit certainty of how to proceed.
>
> A minimum of intelligence is required, of course.
>
> Anybody else who cannot find the next line?
> Anybody else who does not see the difference between set theory and
> mathematics?
Oh please tell me more about the next line! It is so funny when you quack
about other people's intelligence.
--
Neueste Forschungsergebnisse aus deutschen Spitzenhochschulen. Heute von
Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Mückenheim, Mathematikkoryphäe der FH Augsburg, aus
seiner Postille "Physical constraints of numbers": "Even some single
numbers smaller than 2^10^100 ... do not exist."
|
|
