|
|
Re: To K-12 teachers here: Another enjoyable post from Dan Meyer
Posted:
Jul 16, 2012 10:02 PM
|
|
> > On Jul 16, 2012, at 8:38 AM, Richard Strausz > <Richard.Strausz@farmington.k12.mi.us> wrote: > > >> I'll look at this later tonight. I know that, as > >> defined by Dan, the 3-acts cannot teach Algebra. > So > >> the question is how is this teacher defining the > >> 3-acts and is this teacher teaching Algebra. > >> > >> Bob Hansen > >> > > As you look at this later (I don't know how you > have the time to do all that you do!!), please keep > in mind that 3-acts don't teach a curriculum. They > motivate students and add a focus to instruction. > > > > Richard > > You say that but Dan does not say that. I have looked > through his gigabytes of weekly lessons and it is > primarily these media problems over and over and what > little algebra there is it is an after thought. No > one here has disagreed with the idea that a > curriculum should include engaging problems. Dan goes > MUCH further than that. I think I can sum up the > issue as follows... > > Algebra is not the study of problems, it is the study > of solutions, Algebraic solutions. > > When you use engaging problems they should engage the > students in that study. Dan's problems do not do this > because Dan refuses to frame them up that way. You > can only frame them up that way with exposition and > lecture and Dan is of the religion that telling > students is wrong. I don't know why teachers like Dan > or the authors of that Discovering Arithmetic book > get so far off the track of teaching algebra. I gave > my most frequent thought. Their students and the fact > that they are forced to teach them algebra drive them > to it. > > Bob Hansen
The 3-acts, begun (I think) by Meyer but now produced by others too, aren't Algebra or Geometry curriculum. I have never seen a claim to the contrary on his materials.
Richard
|
|