The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Replies: 16   Last Post: Jul 30, 2012 10:57 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Clyde Greeno

Posts: 68
Registered: 5/21/10
Posted: Jul 28, 2012 3:19 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Thanks, Paul ....
for surfacing what "the math wars" really are all about ... beneath the
superficialities of scholastic "standards" and "scores", etc.

Mankind's survival ("salvation", if you prefer) ... and the socio-economic
health of nations, communities, families, and individuals ... depends on
improvement of personal abilities to think ... rationally, creatively,
analytically, and humanely. Genuine education in genuine mathematics (Vs.
mere data-processing) develops that kind of thinking power. But most of
American core-curricular instruction in "mathematics" actually suppresses
that kind of thinking.

Although living within, and functioning within, "communities" requires
co-operation within the communities' parameters (laws, mores, traditions,
etc.), the righteousness of those parameters always is subject to
reexamination, debate, and updating. Blind subservience to "authority" is
as detrimental to a democracy -- and to its system of education --- as it is
to personal mental health.

Underlying the American tradition of "direct" instruction in mathematics
has been the pervasive theme of *authority* instruction ... "It is so,
because the books and I say so ... and your grade depends on your
performing, accordingly." The instructional "authorities" commonly know far
too little about curricular mathematics, and even less about genuine
education in that area. In truth, good direct instruction can impart
rational learning ... but in practice, most practices of direct instruction
rely on blind subservience.

The "math wars" conflict is not truly over direct Vs. indirect instruction.
It actually is about whether mathematics should be learned, rationally, or
through the dictates of "authorities" ... who might have written math
"bibles" or who just teach their own interpretations of such "bibles." Good
education in good mathematics, while humanistic, is not anti-theistic. But
like democracy, it is antithetical to blind faith and subservience.


- --------------------------------------------------
From: "Paul A. Tanner III" <>
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 2:38 PM
To: <>

> Published: July 23, 2012 at 5:08 a.m. PDT - Updated: July 23, 2012 at 5:08
> a.m. PDT
> Some recent headlines from the alternate universe of modern conservatism:
> Rush Limbaugh claims the bad guy in the new Batman movie was named Bane to
> remind voters of Mitt Romney's controversial tenure at Bain Capital.
> Michelle Bachmann, citing zero credible evidence, accuses a
> Muslim-American aide to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton of conspiring
> with the Muslim Brotherhood.
> Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio's crack investigators announce that President
> Obama's long-form birth certificate is a fake.
> In other words, it's just an average week down there in Crazy Town. And
> that lends a certain context to a tidbit brought to national attention
> last week by Stephen Colbert of Comedy Central's "The Colbert Report."
> Meaning a plank from the 2012 platform of the Republican Party of Texas
> which, astonishingly enough, reads as follows: "We oppose the teaching of
> Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) (values clarification), critical
> thinking skills and similar programs that are simply a relabeling of
> Outcome-Based Education (OBE) (mastery learning) which focus on behavior
> modification and have the purpose of challenging the student's fixed
> beliefs and undermining parental authority."
> Holy wow. That is, without a doubt, the most frightening sentence this
> side of a Stephen King novel.
> The Texas GOP has set itself explicitly against teaching children to be
> critical thinkers. Never mind the creeping stupidization of this country,
> the growing dumbification of our children, our mounting rejection of, even
> contempt for, objective fact. Never mind educators who lament the
> inability of American children to think, to weigh conflicting paradigms,
> analyze competing arguments, to reason, ruminate, question and reach a
> thoughtful conclusion. Never mind that this promises the loss of our
> ability to compete in an ever more complex and technology-driven world.
> Never mind. The Texas branch of one of our two major political parties
> opposes teaching critical thinking skills or anything that might challenge
> a child's "fixed beliefs." So presumably, if a child is of the "fixed
> belief" that Jesus was the first president of the United States or that
> 2+2 = apple trees or that Florida is an island in an ocean on the moon,
> educators ought not correct the little genius lest she (gasp!) change her
> "fixed belief," thereby undermining mom and dad.
> That's just ... just ...
> Holy wow.
> For what it's worth, the Texas GOP says that language was not supposed to
> be in the platform. Spokesman Chris Elam says its inclusion "was an
> oversight on the subcommittee's part."
> If that explanation leaves you cold, join the club. That such an asinine
> position was even under consideration is hardly comforting. And the fact
> that something so neon stupid escaped notice of both the subcommittee and
> the full platform committee suggests the Texas GOP could use a little
> critical thinking instruction itself.
> Remember when Republicans were grown-ups? Agree with them or not, you
> never thought of Bob Dole, George H.W. Bush, Gerald Ford, even Richard
> Nixon as less than serious, substantive adults, susceptible like all
> serious, substantive adults, to logic and reason.
> The party has since devolved. A toxic stew of faith-based politics, biased
> "news," and echo chamber punditry has reduced it to an anti-science,
> anti-reason, anti-intellect caricature of itself. Thoughtful
> conservatives - thoughtful Americans - ought to be alarmed.
> How can you have a healthy democracy when a major party not only tolerates
> lunacy, but elevates it to positions of power? In what sane nation does
> someone like Rush Limbaugh have a mass audience, Michelle Bachmann an
> elected office, Joe Arpaio a badge?
> Well, the Texas GOP just came out against critical thinking. That explains
> a lot.
> Leonard Pitts Jr., winner of the 2004 Pulitzer Prize for commentary, is a
> columnist for the Miami Herald, 1 Herald Plaza, Miami, Fla. 33132. Readers
> may write to him via email at Leonard Pitts will
> be chatting with readers every Wednesday from 1 p.m. to 2 p.m. EDT on

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.