Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Almost duplicate theorems
Replies: 7   Last Post: Aug 12, 2012 6:29 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Ken.Pledger@vuw.ac.nz

Posts: 1,269
Registered: 12/3/04
Re: Almost duplicate theorems
Posted: Aug 8, 2012 5:36 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <jvtm3j$78b$1@speranza.aioe.org>,
Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> wrote:

> ....
> Let I have "P(X) for every poset X" theorem in section 1.
>
> Is it good to have "P(X) for every boolean lattice X" proposition (which
> trivially follows from that theorem) in section 2?
> ....



Yes, to exhibit its connection with the earlier theorem. You may like
to look at Paul Halmos, "How to Write Mathematics", section 11: "Do and
do not repeat". It's just over a page long, so I don't want to type it
out here.

Ken Pledger.



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2013. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.