> In fact, I offered two proofs: one by demonstration (the bet you shy > away from), and another by your own proof method, which you snipped. > I'll give the snipped proof again: > > Every sentence in this paragraph is false. Dan Cristensen's argument > about the liar paradox is nonsense. > > And that is QED. By your own reasoning, the first sentence in the above > paragraph can't be true, so the second one must be, since it is the only > other one.
There is, of course, a third possibility: Since you could not possibly have written the paragraph above(!), Dan Christensen never saw it. Hence it is impossible for him to comment on a non-existing email.