The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Reliability of mathematical functions from
Replies: 1   Last Post: Oct 14, 2012 7:20 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 780
Registered: 7/12/10
Reliability of mathematical functions from
Posted: Oct 12, 2012 10:29 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Does anyone have any opinions about the general reliability/usability of the mathematical functions in the boost library, for example the inverse of the cdf for t distributions and the inverse incomplete beta function etc?

How does it compare with commercially available products such as the matlab toolboxes?

[The reason I'm asking is that I'm interested in hearing such opinions. So please don't reply to this thread by saying something like "The answer to your question is yes, some people do have opinions about the boost library. However, I am not such a person."]

Thank You,

Paul Epstein

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.