Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.stat.math.independent

Topic: Reducing bias of a Bayesian point estimator
Replies: 13   Last Post: Oct 19, 2012 3:02 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
paulvonhippel at yahoo

Posts: 72
Registered: 7/13/05
Re: Reducing bias of a Bayesian point estimator
Posted: Oct 18, 2012 5:52 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Thursday, October 18, 2012 2:40:45 AM UTC-5, Ray Koopman wrote:
> On Oct 13, 3:45 pm, Paul <paulvonhip...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>

> > Bias is important. The quantity that I am estimating, gamma, is a variance that will be used to calculate confidence intervals. If the estimate of gamma is negatively biased, then the coverage of the confidence intervals will be too low.
>
> >
>
> > What is an appropriate loss function to use under these circumstances?
>
>
>
> One easy fix would be to add a penalty function, say some multiple of
>
> log(1-gamma). Then all that remains is to justify it.


Thanks, this is interesting. Are you suggesting a penalized likelihood, or would the penalty be used in another way?



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.