The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.stat.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: The J-B test again (and again. . . )
Replies: 2   Last Post: Jan 2, 2013 12:26 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Luis A. Afonso

Posts: 4,758
From: LIsbon (Portugal)
Registered: 2/16/05
The J-B test again (and again. . . )
Posted: Oct 21, 2012 5:42 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

The J-B test again (and again)

The Jarque-Bera Test shouldn?t be taken as a Goodness-of Fit one (Gof). The reason is evident: when we add two quantities and check if the result doesn?t exceed a certain value, the critical value, we loss track of each individually.
It?s vital to keep in mind that we start with a sample which the distribution is unknown.
When we fail to reject by J-B test we can assert that the total, only it, of the Skewness and Excess Kurtosis are in conformity with those normal data shows. So we are not allowed to say whatever concerning theses parameters values individually, as it was demanded by the test. Conclusion: the test is not a Gof one. In fact, a too large Skewness to be normal can be associated with a sufficiently small Kurtosis in order that the sum could indicate, wrongly, that there is no sufficient evidence to reject normality.

Luis A. Afonso

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.