Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.stat.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
The JB test again (and again. . . )
Replies:
2
Last Post:
Jan 2, 2013 12:26 PM



Luis A. Afonso
Posts:
4,758
From:
LIsbon (Portugal)
Registered:
2/16/05


The JB test again (and again. . . )
Posted:
Oct 21, 2012 5:42 AM


The JB test again (and again)
The JarqueBera Test shouldn?t be taken as a Goodnessof Fit one (Gof). The reason is evident: when we add two quantities and check if the result doesn?t exceed a certain value, the critical value, we loss track of each individually. It?s vital to keep in mind that we start with a sample which the distribution is unknown. When we fail to reject by JB test we can assert that the total, only it, of the Skewness and Excess Kurtosis are in conformity with those normal data shows. So we are not allowed to say whatever concerning theses parameters values individually, as it was demanded by the test. Conclusion: the test is not a Gof one. In fact, a too large Skewness to be normal can be associated with a sufficiently small Kurtosis in order that the sum could indicate, wrongly, that there is no sufficient evidence to reject normality.
Luis A. Afonso



