Haim posted Oct 21, 2012 12:18 AM (GSC's remarks interspersed): > > GS Chandy Posted: Oct 20, 2012 7:50 AM > > >I must observe that I personally find Mr Robert > Hansen's > >comments above, as described in Hake's message, to > be > >highly objectionable and indeed extremely offensive > - > >and perhaps they are even 'actionable' legally. > > Hansen's comments are not actionable. > So you claim. Are you a legal expert?
- - Yes? Kindly let us see your legal credentials
- - No? Then on what basis do you make that claim? Is it the same basis, perhaps, as that on which you give your ridiculous 'Hitlerian' commands:
- -- "PUT THE EDUCATION MAFIA IN JAIL!"
and your latest 'not-quite-Hitlerian'-but-definitely-equally-ridiculous command:
- -- "CLOSE DOWN THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION!"
or the same basis on which Professor Bishop gives HIS own 'Hitlerian' command: - -- "BLOW UP THE SCHOOLS OF EDUCATION!"
(The word 'Hitlerian' is NOT in the dictionary, so far as I know. It is something I just thought up, as it seems to be a pretty good way to describe those three utterly ridiculous commands, which seem calculated EXACTLY to mitigate against any possibility of changing things in US education - assuming there is anything that needs to be changed in US education).
(It should be possible, in a democracy - even in a 'democracy' like the USA, which is only nominal [like India] - to change many things about institutions and instrumentalities in the 'democracy' - but it will NEVER happen for as long as such ridiculous 'Hitlerian' commands are floating around the public mindspace).
> For actionable comments, see: > > >I have in several of my postings here demonstrated > >clearly that Hansen has actively lied in regard to > >his descriptions of work done by me. > I repeat: BOTH you AND Hansen have actively lied in regard to your descriptions of work done by me. Why not take suitable action against me, legal expert that you are? > > about which I have two comments. First, I do not > understand why the moderator allows Chandy to > continue posting in this forum. > Perhaps the moderator does not share your (undoubtedly sore) feelings? > >Two, Hansen deserves > Chandy for continuing to interact with him. > And yet, now YOU are continuing to interact with Chandy. Does that mean that you deserve Chandy? Well... > > > However, the rest of us do not deserve Chandy so I > o I am begging you, Bob, please stop. > Apparently "Bob" does not feel the need to heed your pleas... why not issue another Hitlerian command?
GSC ("Still Shoveling Away!" - with apologies if due to Barry Garelick for any tedium caused; and with the observation that it is EASY to avoid such tedium by the simple expedient of not opening any messge purporting to originate from GSC) > > Haim > No representation without taxation. Indeed.