GogoJF
Posts:
48
Registered:
12/16/09
|
|
Re: The Powerset Proof - REWORDED!
Posted:
Nov 1, 2012 9:56 PM
|
|
On Nov 1, 8:49 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Nov 1, 7:09 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 2, 1:41 am, George Greene <gree...@email.unc.edu> wrote:
>
> > > > But the Base Step does not hold for ANY SINGLE value of k.
>
> > > The argument YOU JUST MADE holds FOR ANY value of k :
>
> > > BASE: 1 e f(1) then ~1 e MISS
>
> > > > ~1 e f(1) then 1 e MISS
> > > > ergo ~MISS = f(1)
>
> > > By induction, ~MISS=f(any k), i.e., ~MISS e f.
>
> > Nice work George! Working out the missing base step in my argument!
>
> > GIVEN ANY POWERSET PROOF OF UNCOUNTABILITY,
> > THERE IS A MISSING BASE STEP NOT IN THE BODY OF THAT PROOF!
>
> > |N| = |PN|
>
> > BWWHAHAHAHAH! Now that's funny!
>
> > Herc
>
> The whole value of the base power of human magnification of the
> average observer is 10,000. This is a single number value of the
> theoretical length and width value of maximum visual acuity according
> to Guyton.
A single number of the standard length and width proportion of vision.
|
|
