Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: The Powerset Proof - REWORDED!
Replies: 14   Last Post: Nov 8, 2012 4:11 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 GogoJF Posts: 49 Registered: 12/16/09
Re: The Powerset Proof - REWORDED!
Posted: Nov 1, 2012 10:14 PM

On Nov 1, 9:10 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Nov 1, 7:09 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> > On Nov 2, 1:41 am, George Greene <gree...@email.unc.edu> wrote:
>
> > > > But the Base Step does not hold for ANY SINGLE value of k.
>
> > > The argument YOU JUST MADE holds FOR ANY value of k :
>
> > > BASE:  1 e f(1) then  ~1 e MISS
>
> > > >      ~1 e f(1) then 1 e MISS
> > > >     ergo   ~MISS = f(1)

>
> > > By induction, ~MISS=f(any k), i.e., ~MISS e f.
>
> > Nice work George!  Working out the missing base step in my argument!
>
> > GIVEN ANY POWERSET PROOF OF UNCOUNTABILITY,
> > THERE IS A MISSING BASE STEP NOT IN THE BODY OF THAT PROOF!

>
> > |N| = |PN|
>
> > BWWHAHAHAHAH!  Now that's funny!
>
> > Herc
>
> We have , in most instances, regarded the base as equaling one- not
> knowing internally that the "base" actually represents a real
> existence and power- and significant quantifying meaning.

What do you think the power of the number one means?

Date Subject Author
10/31/12 Graham Cooper
11/1/12 bacle
11/1/12 Rupert
11/1/12 Graham Cooper
11/1/12 Rupert
11/1/12 rt servo
11/1/12 Graham Cooper
11/1/12 GogoJF
11/1/12 GogoJF
11/1/12 GogoJF
11/1/12 GogoJF
11/2/12 Graham Cooper
11/8/12 Graham Cooper