The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.stat.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Sufficient large samples lead surely to reject H0 . . .
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
Luis A. Afonso

Posts: 4,758
From: LIsbon (Portugal)
Registered: 2/16/05
Sufficient large samples lead surely to reject H0 . . .
Posted: Nov 7, 2012 11:38 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Sufficient large samples lead surely to reject H0 . . .

A drawback usually ascribed to NHST: Samples from nature very rarely, or never, are conformable with theoretical model . . . enough to increase sample sizes to be aware.
Inference: Worthless to find out if the Null is rejected or not rejected: The result do depend how many observed items used, and worse, one infallibly has to reject it.
Analysis__ Two possibilities should be distinguished (if possible): the sample does include extraneous values, and are discarded, or an unknown Population feature come into sight, leading to modify the parameter value we check.
Is just, I mean, time to research in depth how to adapt the model to the find. (Why the cygnet is black?)
Do remember: *scientific culture* follows the Occam´s razor criterion: The simplest model that is conformable with experience/observation should be followed:'s_razor

Luis A. Afonso

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.