Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.stat.math.independent

Topic: Sufficient large samples lead surely to reject H0 . . .
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
Luis A. Afonso

Posts: 4,520
From: LIsbon (Portugal)
Registered: 2/16/05
Sufficient large samples lead surely to reject H0 . . .
Posted: Nov 7, 2012 11:38 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Sufficient large samples lead surely to reject H0 . . .

A drawback usually ascribed to NHST: Samples from nature very rarely, or never, are conformable with theoretical model . . . enough to increase sample sizes to be aware.
Inference: Worthless to find out if the Null is rejected or not rejected: The result do depend how many observed items used, and worse, one infallibly has to reject it.
Analysis__ Two possibilities should be distinguished (if possible): the sample does include extraneous values, and are discarded, or an unknown Population feature come into sight, leading to modify the parameter value we check.
Is just, I mean, time to research in depth how to adapt the model to the find. (Why the cygnet is black?)
Do remember: *scientific culture* follows the Occam´s razor criterion: The simplest model that is conformable with experience/observation should be followed:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor


Luis A. Afonso



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.