The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Education » mathedcc

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Romney Wasn't Conservative Enough -- Statistically Feasible?
Replies: 10   Last Post: Nov 14, 2012 9:57 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 2
Registered: 11/8/12
Romney Wasn't Conservative Enough -- Statistically Feasible?
Posted: Nov 8, 2012 12:20 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Not really sure if this is the correct forum for this, but here goes:

After the presidential election, a number of pundits are saying that gov. Romney lost because >> he wasn't conservative enough <<.

Thinking about this mathematically, I've drawn a simple number line of political affiliation below.
The spectrum extends from 100% liberal (-1) on the left to 100% conservative (+1) on the right.

In order to appeal to the MAXIMUM number of voters, isn't it clear that a candidate should position
himself/herself EXACTLY IN THE CENTER (i.e., at the "0" point along the number line)?

How can one's moving further to the right (away from "0" and closer to "+1") possibly have the effect
of attracting more voters?

100% Liberal Moderate 100% Conservative

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.