Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Cantor's first proof,
Replies: 115   Last Post: Nov 15, 2012 4:43 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Michael Klemm

Posts: 70
Registered: 11/13/12
Re: Cantor's first proof,
Posted: Nov 13, 2012 2:45 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

WM wrote:

> Consider the set of all positive rational numbers as existing.
> Fill into the vase all numbers of the interval (0, 1]. Then enumerate
> one of them by 1 and take it off the vase.
> Fill into the vase all numbers of the interval (1, 2]. Then enumerate
> one of them by 2 and take it off the vase.
> Fill into the vase all numbers of the interval (2, 3]. Then enumerate
> one of them by 3 and take it off the vase.
> Continue until all rational numbers have been enumerated. Then all
> have been taken off the vase. The remaining set of not enumerated
> rationals is empty.


> This result is nonsense from the mathematical standpoint.

You are right, your result is nonsense. If the rational number
taken off the interval (n-1, n] is n then you define just the
identity map on N and not a map Q,>0 -> N.

Greetings
Michael





Date Subject Author
11/9/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/9/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/9/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/9/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/9/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/9/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/9/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/9/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/9/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/11/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/11/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/11/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/11/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/11/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/11/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/11/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
William Hughes
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/13/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
William Hughes
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
William Hughes
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Frederick Williams
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/11/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
William Hughes
11/12/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/12/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
William Hughes
11/12/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
William Hughes
11/12/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/12/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
William Hughes
11/13/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/13/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/13/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/12/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
William Hughes
11/13/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/13/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/12/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Frederick Williams
11/13/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/13/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/13/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/13/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/12/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/12/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/12/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/12/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/12/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/12/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/13/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/13/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/13/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/13/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/13/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/13/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/14/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/14/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/14/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Michael Klemm
11/13/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Michael Klemm
11/13/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/13/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/13/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/14/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/14/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/14/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Michael Stemper
11/14/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Michael Stemper
11/14/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
quasi
11/14/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
quasi
11/14/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Michael Stemper
11/14/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/14/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/15/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/15/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/13/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/12/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/12/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/12/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/12/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/12/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/12/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/12/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/12/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/11/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/11/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/11/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/11/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/11/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/11/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/11/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/11/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/9/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/9/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/9/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
LudovicoVan
11/10/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Uirgil
11/9/12
Read Re: Cantor's first proof,
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.