(courtesy of adamk) > > > > Your above is a worthwhile reply for it has content and meaning.
Which is more than one can say about ** all your posts put together**
So > > you should improve on your posts to sci newsgroups by filling in more > > content and meaning that gives the other person something to respond > > to. > > > > Now as for your above, I do not believe Old Math ever considered lines > > with holes in them
Wrong as usual.
and that the intersection maybe empty space. At > > least I never saw anyone with writings to that idea.
Not knowing has never stopped you from commenting -- on the contrary, actually.
>But I never took > > a course in Discrete Math, for perhaps someone in math did start the > > idea of lines as successive numbers and empty space between.
Big mouth, a lot of talk, before doing any serious research -- this is
yet another reason why your opinion matters so little to , well, anyone.
Question: has anyone ever actually _asked_ for your opinion?
I mean, I'm curious, since you offer your opinion so freely to anyone,
you must , for some reason unknown to me, believe someone, anyone cares
about what you have to say. Would you explain what makes you think anyone
does care about your opinion? > > > > Of course in Physics that is the normal thought because of quantum > > mechanics, but in mathematics the norm is absolute continuity.
Here you embarrass yourself again, and show, yet again, that you have
no idea of what you're talking about, yet you make these categorical
statements before , if ever, bothering to inform yourself. > > > > AP