> Let me pause for a moment with a spot-summary. > > In Physics we have the smallest reality as a atom. > The atom has > subatomic particles, but still the atom is the > smallest item of > physics. Everything that is subatomic has no reality > save for the fact > that atoms exist. Analogy: humans are the smallest > human item, for we > do not think of human hands or human eyes or human > livers as smaller > independent items. > > In Mathematics the smallest item is a point and line > where a line > consists of points. > > In Old Math, they started out their Geometry with > axioms that claimed > a point has no extent, no length, no width, no > breath. And another > axiom that said a line has length but no width, no > breadth. Funny how > they attributed length to a line in an axiom but no > width or no > breadth. And if any mathematician had been really > alert would have > been repelled by such lack of logic. > > In New Math, we start out with the axioms of Old > Math, but then we > clean house afterwards. We reexamine them > and realize that the Ellipsoid of Elliptic Geometry > provides us with a > "line" that serves as the line in the Euclidean > Geometry. We realize > finite with infinity has a borderline that is a > number itself-- > pi*10^603 and that then forces the smallest positive > Real number to be > the inverse of the borderline number. That then, > forces there to be > holes or gaps between successive Reals and that all > the Reals from 0 > to pi*10^603 is this set: > > 0, 1/10^603, 2/10^603, 3/10^603, . . pi*10^603 > > So now, we see there is a hole or gap between two > successive Reals of > a metric of 10^-603 (using the abbreviation of > infinity as 10^603) > > Now in a proof that at 10^603 the three zero digits > in a row in > truncated pi allow for the surface area of the > Ellipsoid, the longest > and thinnest ellipsoid possible is one in which its > length is 10^603 > while both its width and breadth are 10^-603. And > that surface area is > in total 12 square units. > > This gives us a metric of the size of a Number point > in mathematics to > be about 10^-604. > > So we have holes between Successive Number points of > 10^-603 and we > have Number Points as tiny circles of 10^-604 (also > for 3rd > dimension). We also then, have the line width and > breadth to be > 10^-604. > > So that in Geometry, like Physics, we have the > smallest things as > atoms and then are composed of subatomic particles > like neutrons, > protons, electrons, neutrinos, photons and gobs and > gobs of other > particles, all because the atom itself is the > smallest item in > physics. In Geometry we have the same sort of pattern > that we have an > entire Geometry such as Euclidean or Elliptic or > Hyperbolic and we > have subgeometry of points and lines. > > The overall geometry itself gives us the subgeometry > of points and > lines and points and lines have length, width and > breadth. > > So we start with Numbers and fetch the borderline > between Finite and > Infinite. Once that is fetched we take the inverse of > it as the > smallest nonzero number. That gives us the measure of > the holes or > gaps between numbers. Then we go to Elliptic Geometry > to find the > longest yet thinnest possible figure and it is a > ellipsoid and given > the constraints of the infinity borderline, we find > out the metric > measure of its smallest surface area. > > We use that to figure out the metric of the "line and > the point" for > geometry, whether Euclidean, Elliptic or Hyperbolic. > > We can use the Ellipsoid formula of this: > > S approx equal to 4pi ((a^p*b^p + a^p*c^p + b^p* > c^p)/ 3)^1/p > > Where the a, b, c are axes and the p is a value that > is > the golden ratio, the phi constant of 1.618..
The phi constant does not exist in your system, idiot.
> > Keep in mind the pi and phi are truncated at the > 603rd digit > rightwards of the decimal point so that the above > formula no longer is > approx but rather ends up being thoroughly equal.
False. You need Phi to equal k* 10^(-603) , or the
number Phi does not exist in your system; it falls
within the gaps of your idiotic number system -- and
this is not the case. Same thing for Pi, which does not
exist in your system, nor e, nor....
So yours is a truly useful "correction", imbecile.
> The reason infinity borderline is pi to the 603rd > digit truncated is > because that formula becomes exactitude and no longer > approximation. > > I used to have access to a supercomputer, but no > longer, but if > someone does have access and is willing to compute, I > am confident > (not certain) that if pi, phi truncated that the > formula renders > equality and no longer approximation.
Of course, you offer nothing for someone else's work,
right after calling everyone here a faker. Yes, let me
run to work for you, so you can keep insulting me. > > But the overall gist of the summary is important > because no longer is > mathematics stifled by axioms that say a line and > point are > "abstractions", but rather they are part and parcel > of the geometry > itself and require, demand to have not just length > but width and > breadth. In Old Math, they never had a borderline > with finite to > infinite and so were never able to assemble what the > width and breadth > of a point or line was. In New Math we put aside that > encumbrance and > we fill out mathematics that requires filling.
for feeble minds like yours. > > The atom in Physics was an abstraction up until the > advent of modern > chemistry when it was apparent that these tiny > entities had to have > length, width, breadth and substance. It is about > time that > mathematics grows up and grows out of its shell of > hiding behind > "abstraction".
As usual, you miss the point. > > Google's New-Newsgroups censors AP posts but Drexel's > Math Forum does > not and my posts in archive form is seen here: