The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Curvature in Cartesian Plane
Replies: 6   Last Post: Nov 15, 2012 8:53 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Brad Cooper

Posts: 171
Registered: 12/8/04
Re: Curvature in Cartesian Plane
Posted: Nov 14, 2012 11:50 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Thank you for your replies.

"Mike Terry" <> wrote in message
> "dy/dx" <dydx-1@gmail.invalid> wrote in message
> news:k80olc$8ee$

> > On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:23:06 +1000, Brad Cooper wrote:
> >

> > > I expect that this is true...
> > >
> > > We have three points on a Cartesian x-y plane, and the circle that

> passes through these three points has a constant curvature of k.
> > >
> > > If we have a doubly differentiable curve in the x-y plane that passes

> through these points, is there always some point on the curve which has
> curvature k?

> > >
> > > I am finding it tough to prove this. Any help appreciated.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Brad

> >
> > If you're having difficulty proving something, it may be worth
> > considering
> > the possibility that it's false.
> >
> > In this case, if I imagine a V-shaped pair of line segments joining the
> > three points, then rounding the corner of the V so it's
> > twice-differentiable (but widening the V slightly so the curve still
> > goes
> > through the middle point), it's clear that the curvature goes from 0 up
> > through k to a higher value at the middle point, then down through k to
> > 0
> > again.
> >
> > However, if I then imagine superimposing a high-frequency "coiling" on

> this
> > curve, like a telephone cord projected down to 2D, arranging that it
> > still
> > pass through all three points, it seems it should be possible to keep
> > the
> > curvature everywhere higher than some lower bound B > k. (The curve will
> > now self-intersect.)

> ..or it is easy to think of example curves where the curvature stays
> arbitrarily low (e.g. sort of resembling a large 3-leafed clover).
> Mike.

I had not considered that the curve could cross back over itself and so I
never added this restriction.

The helical telephone cord projected down to 2D and the 3-leafed clover both
cross over themselves. I would like to just consider a simple curve which
doesn't cross itself.

While investigating this I came across this in Spiegel's Vector Analysis:

The radius of curvature rho of a plane curve with equation y = f(x), i.e. a
curve in the xy plane is given by

rho = sqrt(1+(y')^2) / |y''|

I tested this with the simple hemisphere y = sqrt(1-x^2).

At x = 0, it correctly gives rho as 1, but at x = 0.4 it incorrectly gives
rho = 0.84

For any value other than x = 0, rho is incorrect.

I was trying to use the above formula for rho to help with my investigation
(amongst a lot of other things). Now I seem to be further away!!

Isn't the radius of curvature of the hemisphere 1?


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2017. All Rights Reserved.