Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Topic: Linear approximation to certainty equivalent for small-valued random variable
Replies: 3   Last Post: Nov 21, 2012 5:21 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Ken.Pledger@vuw.ac.nz Posts: 1,412 Registered: 12/3/04
Re: Linear approximation to certainty equivalent for small-valued random variable
Posted: Nov 18, 2012 3:37 PM

In article

> I'm following Keeney's interpretation of risk aversion at
> http://tinyurl.com/d2jskgb. For a lottery involving the addition of a
> small-valued zero-mean random variable x~ to a (presumably much
> larger) offset x0, the definition of risk premium (equation 4.15) is
> Taylor expanded (4.16 and 4.17) before dropping all terms beyond first
> order (4.18).
>
> I can see why this is justified in 4.17, but I'm not 100% sure in
> 4.16. Usually, higher order terms are dropped when small numbers are
> raised to high powers. In 4.16 this case, would the reason be that pi
> is small? It is after all the risk premium for x~. Since x~ is very
> small, the expectation and the mean are small. x~ is the difference
> between expectation and mean, and so it must be small?

You may be lucky enough to get an answer here, but have you tried the
<alt.sci.math.probability> or <sci.stat.math> news group?

Ken Pledger.

Date Subject Author
11/15/12 Paul
11/16/12 Paul
11/18/12 Ken.Pledger@vuw.ac.nz
11/21/12 Paul