Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology § 152
Replies: 53   Last Post: Nov 19, 2012 4:49 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Uirgil

Posts: 181
Registered: 4/18/12
Re: Matheology � 152
Posted: Nov 17, 2012 10:27 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <k88p6q$sd$1@dont-email.me>,
"LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> wrote:

> "Uirgil" <uirgil@uirgil.ur> wrote in message
> news:uirgil-B4A0C7.11095217112012@BIGNEWS.USENETMONSTER.COM...

> > In article <k88h5n$eeo$1@dont-email.me>,
> > "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> wrote:

> >> "William Hughes" <wpihughes@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:1ec0c2cc-f926-4fd4-a413-37ba8809ea80@y8g2000yqy.googlegroups.com...

> >> > On Nov 17, 9:59 am, "LudovicoVan" <ju...@diegidio.name> wrote:
> >> >> "William Hughes" <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >> news:28bff553-f679-4e23-8932-a1fb42f1b364@c17g2000yqe.googlegroups.com..
> >> >> .
> >> >>

> >> >> > Note that *set* limits have some important properties.
> >> >>
> >> >> > Given a sequence of sets {B_1,B_2,B_3,...}
> >> >> > then the set limit always exists (it
> >> >> > may be the empty set).

> >> >>
> >> >> > If we have
> >> >>
> >> >> > A = set limit {B_1,B_2,B_3....}
> >> >>
> >> >> > Then
> >> >>
> >> >> > A is a set
> >> >> > A cannot contain an element that is not contained
> >> >> > in any of the B's

> >> >>
> >> >> Williams going around, in circles:
> >> >>
> >> >> It was already mentioned that it is wrong to use that specific
> >> >> definition
> >> >> to
> >> >> solve the balls and vase problem.
> >> >>
> >> >> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limit_superior_and_limit_inferior#Special_
> >> >> cas
> >> >> e:_discrete_metric>

> >> >
> >> > The problem is the above applies to *any* definition of a *set* limit.

> >>
> >> But those definitions are a *specific* case of these:
> >>
> >> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limit_superior_and_limit_inferior#Sequences_o
> >> f_s
> >> ets>
> >>
> >> I sometimes wonder which planet you come from.

> >
> > Irrelevant Ad Hom noted!
> >
> > Actually, William HUghes' "definition" is quite carefully non-specific,
> > and while it certainly includes both a lim_sups and a lim_infs, is in no
> > way limited to only those.
> >
> > So that, as usual, LV has things inverted.

>
> The one who has got something inverted here is you.


Another in the long line of LV's irrelevant ad homs noted!
>
> You are again invited to stop the spam and disturbance
>
> -LV
>

I would, but I have no power to shut off either WM or LV.


Date Subject Author
11/16/12
Read Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/16/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
William Hughes
11/16/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/16/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
LudovicoVan
11/16/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/16/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Uirgil
11/16/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/16/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
LudovicoVan
11/16/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Uirgil
11/16/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
William Hughes
11/16/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Uirgil
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
LudovicoVan
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
LudovicoVan
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Uirgil
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Uirgil
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
LudovicoVan
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
William Hughes
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
trj
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
LudovicoVan
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
William Hughes
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
LudovicoVan
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Uirgil
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
LudovicoVan
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Uirgil
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
William Hughes
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
William Hughes
11/18/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/18/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
William Hughes
11/18/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/18/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
William Hughes
11/18/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/18/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
William Hughes
11/18/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/18/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Vurgil
11/18/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Vurgil
11/18/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Vurgil
11/19/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/19/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Vurgil
11/18/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
Ralf Bader
11/18/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Vurgil
11/19/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/19/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Vurgil
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Uirgil
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Uirgil
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
trj
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Uirgil
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Uirgil
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/17/12
Read Re: Matheology � 152
Virgil
11/18/12
Read Re: Matheology § 152
gus gassmann

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.