In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 17 Nov., 21:21, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > (nor is there a problem that WM two limits are different)- > > Interesting. A nice claim. > The limit of a sequence may depend on the method which is used to > calculate it? Perhaps it may even depend on the person who calculates > it?
When WM calculates it, the result may also depend on WHEN he calculates it, as there is no guarantee that WM will get the same result twice n a row! > > Piffle. Mathematics serves as a tool to predict scientific results. Among many other uses, some of which have no scientific applications.
> > Therefore the result of set theory is humbug.
Only when set theory is being mis-manipulated by humbugs like WM.