The long missed solution of an outstanding problem came from a completely unexpected side: Social science proves the consistency of matheology by carrying out a poll.
But 100 % of all matheologians who responded to our poll said that this difference is not surprising since different methods have been applied, namely the mathematical calculation invented by Cauchy and the matheological method invented by Cantor. Although both names begin with a C (like certainty (and even with a Ca (like can and cannot))) the following letters are completely different.
The general opinion is that it is not surprising to find different results when applying different methods. Even the application of the *same* method by different people may yield different results as we see daily in our elementary schools.
This attitude also has some consequences with respect to the human rights. We should no longer talk of mistakes and errors in calculations and punish pupils who deviate from the majority or main stream, but we should only note beside the result who applied what method and possibly also location and time because experience shows that the result of a calculation may depend on such details.
For, he reasons pointedly: That which must not, can not be. (C. Morgenstern)
