Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Topic: Matheology § 154: Consistency Proof!
Replies: 101   Last Post: Nov 25, 2012 5:08 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Vurgil Posts: 38 Registered: 1/19/12
Re: Matheology � 154: Consistency Proof!
Posted: Nov 19, 2012 5:08 PM

In article
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 19 Nov., 01:15, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 18, 8:04 pm, Vurgil <Vur...@arg.erg> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >

> > > In article

> >
> > >  WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > > > Matheology 154: Consistency Proof!
> >
> > > > The long missed solution of an outstanding problem came from a
> > > > completely unexpected side: Social science proves the consistency of
> > > > matheology by carrying out a poll.

> >
> > > > As recently reported (see matheology 152)
> > > >http://www.hs-augsburg.de/~mueckenh/KB/Matheology.pdf
> > > > mathematics and matheology lead to different values of the continued
> > > > fraction

> >
> > > > 1/((((((10^0)/10)+10^1)/10)+10^2)/10)+ = 0 (Cauchy)
> > > > 1/((((((10^0)/10)+10^1)/10)+10^2)/10)+ > 1 (Cantor)

> >
> > > It is not at all clear that these expressions represent any continued
> > > fraction at all.

> >
> > One of the problems with attempting any discussion with WM
> > is the fact that he is unable or unwilling to define anything.

>
> I am convinced that you are intelligent enough to understand above
> expressions.

I, on the other hand, am not at al convinced that WM is intelligent
enough to understand above expressions.

At least not well enough to explain them to anyone else.
>
> > The idea that he is introducing complications
> > because when he is clear it is obvious he is wrong is
> > hard to resist.
> >

> That is my impression of your reaction. But in oder to test it, here
> is the complete representation of the continued fraction C:
>
> C = (((...((((((10^0)/10)+10^1)/10)+10^2)/10)+... )+10^n)/10)+...
>
> Now take the reciproce and find 1/C = 0 or 1/C > 1? Which one is the
> correct value?

Then C is NOT in the form of a continued fraction at all, at least not
of any standard type.

And WM has provided no reason to suspect that the process has any limit
at all

Date Subject Author
11/18/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/18/12 Vurgil
11/18/12 William Hughes
11/18/12 Vurgil
11/19/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/19/12 Vurgil
11/19/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/19/12 William Hughes
11/19/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/19/12 Vurgil
11/20/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/20/12 Virgil
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/22/12 William Hughes
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/22/12 William Hughes
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/22/12 William Hughes
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/22/12 William Hughes
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/22/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12
11/23/12 Virgil
11/24/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/24/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/24/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/24/12 Virgil
11/25/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/25/12 Virgil
11/25/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/25/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/22/12 Virgil
11/22/12 Virgil
11/22/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/22/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/22/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/19/12 Vurgil
11/20/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/20/12 Virgil
11/22/12 David Valdez