Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Topic: Matheology § 154: Consistency Proof!
Replies: 101   Last Post: Nov 25, 2012 5:08 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de Posts: 18,076 Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 154: Consistency Proof!
Posted: Nov 24, 2012 3:40 AM

On 23 Nov., 22:37, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

> Analysis can show that the limit VALUE is oo in the extended reals, but
> does not presume to claim that there is a decimal, or any other place
> value based numeral, representing that limit value.

If the limit value
Limit[n-->oo] SUM[k=0 to n] a_k*10^k = oo
is accepted in the extended reals, then it is simply ridiculous to
claim that the abbreviation
..., a_k, ..., a_3, a_2, a_1, a_0
is not in the abbreviations of the extended reals.

But William had agreed: "On the contrary, the fact that the analytic
*limit* cannot be described in terms of digits is the point."

And he stated proudly:

Analysis:
limit in real numbers: unbounded
(oo in extended reals)
limit of set of 1's: not estimated

Set Theory
limit in real numbers: not estimated
limit of set of 1's: {}

Therefore he would have to confess now that there is a contradiction
between set theory and analysis. On the other hand we know the first
commandment of matheology:

There's no con-
tra-dic-tion!
There's no con-
tra-dic-tion!
There's no con-
tra-dic-tion!
...

Regards, WM

Date Subject Author
11/18/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/18/12 Vurgil
11/18/12 William Hughes
11/18/12 Vurgil
11/19/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/19/12 Vurgil
11/19/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/19/12 William Hughes
11/19/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/19/12 Vurgil
11/20/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/20/12 Virgil
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/21/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/21/12 William Hughes
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/22/12 William Hughes
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/22/12 William Hughes
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/22/12 William Hughes
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/22/12 William Hughes
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/22/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 William Hughes
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12
11/23/12 Virgil
11/24/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/24/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/24/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/24/12 Virgil
11/25/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/25/12 Virgil
11/25/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/25/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 Virgil
11/22/12 Virgil
11/22/12 Virgil
11/22/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/22/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/23/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/23/12 Virgil
11/22/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/21/12 Virgil
11/22/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/19/12 Vurgil
11/20/12 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
11/20/12 Virgil
11/22/12 David Valdez