The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Chapt13.4.05 Maxwell Equations with Magnetic Monopoles gives charge,
mass, spin #1029 New Physics #1149 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Replies: 2   Last Post: Nov 25, 2012 1:02 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 18,572
Registered: 3/31/08
Chapt13.4.05 Maxwell Equations with Magnetic Monopoles gives charge,
mass, spin #1029 New Physics #1149 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Posted: Nov 24, 2012 10:59 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Earlier today I started a post saying this much:

>If you look at magnetic monopoles under Wikipedia they >show the Maxwell Equations fully symmetrical with >monopoles. What that does is gives physics the creation of >mass and speed within the Faraday and Ampere laws. >Before, we knew the Gauss laws as static laws and the >Faraday and Ampere laws as dynamic laws.
>Monopoles give rise to both mass and speed.
>Archimedes Plutonium

What I wanted to convey was the idea that the Maxwell Equations
themselves, the 4 symmetrical Maxwell Equations with the Magnetic
Monopoles gives meaning to the primitive concepts of charge in the two
Gauss's laws, and even the concept of Double Transverse Waves over
that of Single Transverse Waves.

Then, because of the other two laws of Faraday's Law and the Ampere
law in the symmetrical Maxwell Equations that those two laws, the
dynamic laws not the static laws of Gauss's laws, that those two laws
give rise to the creation of the rest mass of particles and to the
speed of particles, and spin.

So charge is created from Gauss's two laws in the symmetrical Maxwell
Equations and then the two dynamic laws of Faraday and Ampere, they
give rise and existence to rest mass and speed and spin.

In Old Physics, they gave a rough description of Static laws of
Maxwell versus Dynamic laws of Maxwell. In New Physics, the charge of
physics comes from Gauss's laws, and the rest-mass, speed and spin
come from Faraday and Ampere laws.

In a previous post I mentioned the fakery of the Higgs boson in Old
Physics, but there is one salvageable part of the Higgs boson
nonsense. There is salvageable the idea that rest-mass comes into
existence due to the laws of physics. Of course not from a fake
crankery of a Higgs mechanism, but rather, rest mass comes into
existence due to the Maxwell Equations, due to the Faraday law and the
Ampere/Maxwell law with magnetic monopoles. The Maxwell Equations
require a rest-mass exists of particles in order to have those two
Maxwell laws of physics.

In Old Physics, they made a silly dreaming up of a mechanism to
account for rest-mass. In New Physics, we rely only on the Maxwell
Equations to derive rest-mass.

Now it is the Ampere law in the fact that parallel currents attract
that gives us **electron-structure** and the chemical bonds of
Chemistry is the Ampere law. The Ampere law gives us the **spin** of
particles. Now whether it is the Ampere law that gives us the rest-
mass or whether it requires the Faraday law also to give us rest-mass
is not known to me yet. But I will keep pursuing this lead.

Google's New-Newsgroups censors AP posts and halted a proper
archiving of author, but Drexel's Math Forum does not and my posts
in ?archive ?form is seen here:

Archimedes Plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.