Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Topic: Cantor's first proof in DETAILS
Replies: 85   Last Post: Dec 10, 2012 7:23 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 FredJeffries@gmail.com Posts: 1,487 Registered: 11/29/07
Re: Cantor's first proof in DETAILS
Posted: Nov 30, 2012 11:16 AM

On Nov 26, 9:19 pm, "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlay...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Nov 26, 12:03 pm, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
>

> > In article
> >  "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlay...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> > > On Nov 25, 11:22 pm, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlay...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> > > > > EF is simple and it's defined simply as a function, not-a-real-
> > > > > function, standardly modeled by real functions. Dirac's delta and
> > > > > Heaviside's are as so defined, as functions, not-real-functions,
> > > > > standardly modeled by real functions. And, the definition of function
> > > > > itself, here is modern and reflects over time the development of the
> > > > > definition of what is a mathematical function. Then, in actually
> > > > > extending the definition of what are the real numbers, in A theory, it
> > > > > is directly defined, and applied.

>
> > > > > There are hundreds of essays on it here.
>
> > > > Then give a reference to some of them, preferably by someone other than
> > > > yourself.

>
> > > > In particular we need a mathematically satisfactorily definition of your
> > > > alleged EF, again preferably by someone other than yourself, which will
> > > > take it out of the realm of mythology.
> > > > --

>
> > > I wrote all that.
>
> > Did you?
>
> > I certainly do not ever recall seeing your alleged EF adequately
> > presented, and see now no references to where one might see it
> > presented, whether adequately or not.

>
> > And if you still will not provide a reference to it, a url, or something
> > through which anyone can access it to see it for him or her self, it is
> > as if no such thing ever existed.

>
> > Which in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, I will continue to
> > assume.
> > --

>
> http://mathforum.org/kb/search!execute.jspa?forumID=13&objID=f13&forc...
> at least hundreds of results
>
> http://mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?messageID=7888348"Cantor-
> Finlayson theory"
>
> "Equivalency Function"
>
> the first mention
>
> Do you know the old saw about "assume"?
>
> My friends, or as I would so address you, the definition of EF is
> written in some few lines:  constantly monotonically increasing from
> zero through one.

You've had this function for 13 years now and you STILL can't
calculate the area of a triangle with it.

Date Subject Author
11/25/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/25/12 Virgil
11/25/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/25/12 Graham Cooper
11/25/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/25/12 Virgil
11/25/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/26/12 Virgil
11/26/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/26/12 Virgil
11/26/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/26/12 Virgil
11/27/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/27/12 Virgil
11/27/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/27/12 Virgil
11/27/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/28/12 Virgil
11/28/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/28/12 Virgil
11/28/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/28/12 Virgil
11/29/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/29/12 Virgil
11/29/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/30/12 Virgil
11/30/12 FredJeffries@gmail.com
11/30/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/30/12 FredJeffries@gmail.com
11/30/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/1/12 Virgil
11/30/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/1/12 Virgil
12/1/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/1/12 Virgil
12/1/12 FredJeffries@gmail.com
12/1/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/1/12 Virgil
12/2/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/2/12 Virgil
12/2/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/2/12 Virgil
12/3/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/3/12 Virgil
12/3/12 Virgil
12/3/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/3/12 Virgil
12/3/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/4/12 Virgil
12/4/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/4/12 Virgil
12/4/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/4/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/4/12 Virgil
12/4/12 Virgil
12/4/12 Virgil
12/5/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/6/12 Virgil
12/7/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/7/12 Virgil
12/8/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/9/12 Virgil
12/9/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/9/12 Virgil
12/9/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/9/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/9/12 Virgil
12/9/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/9/12 Virgil
12/9/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/9/12 Virgil
12/9/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/10/12 Virgil
12/10/12
12/4/12 Virgil
12/5/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/5/12 Virgil
11/30/12 Virgil
11/25/12 Graham Cooper
11/25/12 Virgil
11/25/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
11/25/12 Virgil