|
|
Re: From Fermat little theorem to Fermat Last Theorem
Posted:
Jan 6, 2013 3:56 AM
|
|
Hello,
consider the case p =3, proved by Euler. Then you see that the assumption a
< p in line 4 is not at all justified.
Regards
Michael
"John Jens" <7arctic77@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:173ed92b-0819-437c-a507-59c666b9b79e@googlegroups.com...
> I won't go back to warn you about possible mistakes in your "proof",
> rather I will only tell you that if you have any hope to be taken
> seriously by anyone seriously related to mathematics you better type down
> your stuff with LaTeX, either in your blog or in a PDF file, otherwise
> many mathematicians, like me say, won't even take the time to try to read
> all that in ASCII.
>
>
>
> Tonio
PDF file http://primemath.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/fltflt.pdf
|
|
