|
|
Re: From Fermat little theorem to Fermat Last Theorem
Posted:
Jan 6, 2013 9:47 AM
|
|
On Sunday, January 6, 2013 10:56:35 AM UTC+2, M_Klemm wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> consider the case p =3, proved by Euler. Then you see that the assumption a
>
> < p in line 4 is not at all justified.
>
> Regards
> Michael
I'm sorry but I don't understand what are you trying to say.
|
|
