Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: finding inverses of block matrices?
Replies: 1   Last Post: Nov 28, 2012 9:43 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Gordon Sande Posts: 137 Registered: 5/13/10
Re: finding inverses of block matrices?
Posted: Nov 28, 2012 9:43 AM

On 2012-11-27 23:35:19 -0400, jude said:

> In looking at some elementary linear algebra textbooks I noticed that
> although they cover matrix inversion in the standard way, using row
> reduction to go from [A | I] to [I | A^(-1)] , when they cover
> inversion of block matrices they don't use the obvious analog. That
> is, for example to find the inverse of say [[A,B],[0,C]] (with
> appropriate conditions) they don't write this matrix augmented by the
> block identity, [[I,0], [0,I]], and then do block row operations ..
> for example multiplying the first row by A^(-1).
> The usual approach these texbooks use is to compute the product of the
> given matrix with some block matrix, say [[X,Y],[Z,W]], and equate the
> result with the block identity and solve the resulting matrix
> equations.
> The first method I described seems simpler and has an obvious
> connection with the method used to find inverses of numerical matrices
> (Gauss-Jordan). It is true that the block row operations require a bit
> more care, particularly with the order of multiplication, but is there
> a more fundamental reason why these textbooks cover this topic the way
> they do?

Perhaps one is just an algebraic rearangement of the other. ;-) The question
then is which one provides more convenient formalae when you get to trying
to implement the block result. Also notice that the block formulae tend to be
applied to only a small numbers of blocks.

Date Subject Author
11/27/12 jw12jw12jw12@yahoo.com
11/28/12 Gordon Sande