Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Matheology S 162
Replies: 3   Last Post: Nov 29, 2012 3:26 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de

Posts: 15,474
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology S 162
Posted: Nov 29, 2012 4:51 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 28 Nov., 19:46, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...@phiwumbda.org> wrote:

> So, your conclusion is that, for every n, the set {n,n+1} is finite?

My conclusion is that for every set {1, ..., n} also the set {1, ...,
n, n+1} is finite!

> If so, surely we agree.  And from this, we infer that every set of
> natural numbers is finite, er, how?


Every set, that is formed by induction beginning with {1}, is finite.
For every set of natural numbers we can prove that all numbers are
finite, hence the set is finite (for completed infinity an infinite
number would be required), and, moreover we can prove that there are
(potentially) infinitely many numbers not in that set.

But a real crackpot stamping with feet and shouting "there is the set
containing all naturals" will impress some other crackpots. No one
else.

Regards, WM



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.