The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.stat.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: A short comment on a Elena. Kulinskaya paper
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
Luis A. Afonso

Posts: 4,758
From: LIsbon (Portugal)
Registered: 2/16/05
A short comment on a Elena. Kulinskaya paper
Posted: Nov 30, 2012 4:06 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply


The A. starts (Abstract) with the assertive justification ?two side statistical tests and p-values are well defined only when the test statistical in question have a symmetrical distribution.? And so invented a way to correct this ?anomaly? by means a ?conditional p-value, Pc? which is obtained by weighting the acceptance interval two sides, left and right, in order that it accounts with the density unique mode: The weights, sum 1, are chosen inverse proportional to the probability tails, and alpha= P(X <=A) + P(X >A), X denoting the test statistics, and A location parameter value like the mean, median or mode. . .
The only and obvious critic to the method is that probabilities we chose for the tails are completely independent from the density shape: alpha/2 for each represents the feature. The fact that p-values are preferentially near to one of the Confidence Interval bounds is completely irrelevant, I mean.
Because arXiv is unmoderated to dump whatever is allowed.

Luis A. Afonso

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.