Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.stat.math.independent

Topic: A short comment on a Elena. Kulinskaya paper
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
Luis A. Afonso

Posts: 4,520
From: LIsbon (Portugal)
Registered: 2/16/05
A short comment on a Elena. Kulinskaya paper
Posted: Nov 30, 2012 4:06 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

See
arXiv:0810.2124v1[math.ST]

The A. starts (Abstract) with the assertive justification ?two side statistical tests and p-values are well defined only when the test statistical in question have a symmetrical distribution.? And so invented a way to correct this ?anomaly? by means a ?conditional p-value, Pc? which is obtained by weighting the acceptance interval two sides, left and right, in order that it accounts with the density unique mode: The weights, sum 1, are chosen inverse proportional to the probability tails, and alpha= P(X <=A) + P(X >A), X denoting the test statistics, and A location parameter value like the mean, median or mode. . .
The only and obvious critic to the method is that probabilities we chose for the tails are completely independent from the density shape: alpha/2 for each represents the feature. The fact that p-values are preferentially near to one of the Confidence Interval bounds is completely irrelevant, I mean.
Because arXiv is unmoderated to dump whatever is allowed.

Luis A. Afonso



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.