Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
|
Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math.independent
Topic:
"base-mass" rather than rest-mass and standardized ratio of 1876 for Electron 0.5 MeV Chapt13.409 Pair Production has to equal Pair Annihilation #1051 New Physics #1171 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
Replies:
2
Last Post:
Dec 3, 2012 3:48 AM
|
 |
|
|
|
"base-mass" rather than rest-mass and standardized ratio of 1876 for Electron 0.5 MeV Chapt13.409 Pair Production has to equal Pair Annihilation #1051 New Physics #1171 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
Posted:
Dec 3, 2012 12:08 AM
|
|
Alright, I need to standardize the numbers, for if I use 0.51 MeV for electron or 0.5 for electron I get different ratio numbers. So what I want to do is standardize the ratio.
I am going to use 0.5 MeV for electron and 938 MeV for proton and so the standard ratio of proton rest mass per electron rest mass is then 938/0.5 = 1876.
Now I have a huge problem here on my hands. Not the problem of making Pair Production equal to Pair Annihilation, but the problem of what a lowest base-mass brings to physics. The lowest base-mass is that of a electron at 0.5 MeV. I cannot think of any other particle that has a lower base-mass. Of course, Old Physics has the fakery of a neutrino having a base-mass (rest-mass) but Old Physics was too dumb to even have a Double Transverse Wave that allows all photons to have the very same constant speed of c. So no-one can trust, nor should they trust Old Physics of a neutrino rest-mass when they could not even understand or realize that light waves are double transverse waves.
So my problem is, the electron is the lowest base-mass particle at 0.5 MeV. Raises the important question of what is the lowest base-kinetic- energy particle? Is it the photon of radio waves or is it the electron- neutrino?
If I were required to answer that question right now, I would say the radio wave is the lowest base-kinetic-energy, but I would run into conflict with the idea that either the electron-neutrino or the radio photon is this:
1M- 1M+
and not this:
1M- 1M- 1M+ 1M+
So which has more energy overall, a electron-neutrino wave or a radio wave?
Now I do know that all light waves are polarizable, and I do not know whether there is a gradation of polarizability of photons. What I am trying to say here is that whether radio waves are odd and different and peculiar in being polarized from visible light or gamma waves.
Can we have a light-wave as this:
1M- 1M- 1M+ 1M+
rather than this:
1E- 1M- 1M+ 1E+
Can we have a light wave as this:
1M- 1M+
where it is just two charged magnetic monopoles with no E field involved?
So all of a sudden this has become immensely complicated. But if I stick to sound logic, I should drag myself through it and be rewarded with new understanding.
Google's New-Newsgroups censors AP posts and halted a proper archiving of author, but Drexel's Math Forum does not and my posts?in archive form is seen here:
http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986
Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
|
|
|
|