Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
Fractals, Wormholes, and Folding
Replies:
1
Last Post:
Dec 8, 2012 9:05 PM



Kevin
Posts:
496
Registered:
5/1/10


Fractals, Wormholes, and Folding
Posted:
Dec 8, 2012 3:15 PM


A person's sense of balance has context in terms of their hypnotic profile... Idiot Boy objectifies to having a brain that contains 'The Secret Vault of Physics'... Idiot Boy has a hypnotic profile... Idiot Boy's hypnotic profile is that he always turns gently to the left and makes sudden right turns... Idiot Boy's brain is a transistor... I am under a transistor... Ya know, I prove a wormhole and all I get is: Not good enough, flip it around... Well, the Statue of Liberty torch is a transistor... Turn the torch upside down... A transistor is at the center of Mandelbrot set and it is relevant to physics... Mandelbrot set is not about symmetry... Mandelbrot set is about frame matching... If you have two frames, then Mandelbrot set gives the angle between two frames in the same plane or parallel planes... It might be the case that Bill's object orientation has premise except for the fact that America is incompetant to prove the relevance of Mandelbrot set. Folding anything by 180 degrees is untenable... I will allow that 90 degree folds might be relevant... The Peace Symbol folds by 90 degrees, given skunk.
A wormhole is when someone approaches from my left and turns left while standing in front of me... If that person walks forward away from me then 'zoom out' proves a wormhole... It doesn't matter if that person walks in a straight line after that point... No matter how chaotic that person's motion is, that person is going in a straight line from my perspective... Just because I'm the only one who has the capacity for 'zoom out', that doesn't mean that wormhole hate is justifiable... So now, just because I say the person has to approach me from the left... does that mean that there is a dire necessity for an approach from the right to justify the balance in the equations or whatnot?... I don't have a symmetry complex... I have a charactor complex instead... Point symmetry means that my point symmetry twin and myself can't fathom each other... A person with a Mussolini complex denies his nature and adopts the characteristics of his point symmetry twin. If I need to objectify myself, then I am 'The Lionhearted Santa Claus'... which in no way is characteristic of my point symmetry twin.



