Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
Compactification
Replies:
15
Last Post:
Mar 17, 2013 6:11 AM




Compactification
Posted:
Dec 11, 2012 11:13 PM


(h,Y is a (Hausdorff) compactification of X when h:X > Y is an embedding, Y is a compact (Hausdorff) space and h(X) is a dense subset of Y.
Why the extra luggage of the embedding for the definition of compactification? Why isn't the definition simply Y is a compactification of X when there's some embedding h:X > Y for which h(X) is a dense subset of Y?
I see no advantage to the first definition. The second definition has the advantage of being simpler and more intuitive. So why is it that the first is used in preference to the second which I've seen used only in regards to one point compactifications?



