Wayne Bishop posted Dec 14, 2012 6:30 AM: > For a long time, I was trying to ignore her > self-serving diatribe hoping it would go away but > Jeremy Kilpatrick's electronic collection of > signatures for Stanford* pushed me over the hump. > Attached is my response cleaned up and looking more > e professional with Jim Milgram's help and more is > available at his website > http://math.stanford.edu/~milgram. > > Wayne > > * http://www.change.org/petitions/the-community-of-math > ematics-educators-join-in-defending-fundamental-values > ?utm_source=guides&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=one_h > undred_signatures > I have expended quite considerable effort in trying to read "A Response to Some of the Points of: When Academic Disagreement Becomes Harassment and Persecution" by Wayne Bishop (with R. James Milgram), the document attached to the above-noted message from Professor Bishop. [I have NOT tried to read the other documentation, to which Professor Bishop has provided links in his message].
I spent a good bit of time on reading that document.
The prose is well-nigh unreadable.
My recommendation: The good Professors Bishop and Milgram would do well to attend a course on "How to Write Clearly and Effectively". I understand such courses are readily available in the USA.
I would have to be paid - and paid very sizably - to read (and properly understand) that turgid document.
GSC ("Still Shoveling Away!" - with apologies if due to Barry Garelick for any tedium caused; and with the observation that the EASY way to avoid such tedium would be to avoid reading any messages purported to originate from GSC. [I understand Mr Garelick is associated in some way with Professor Bishop or Professor Milgram])