The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Re: Jo Boaler reveals attacks by Milgram and Bishop
Replies: 1   Last Post: Dec 14, 2012 5:27 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 8,846
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: Jo Boaler reveals attacks by Milgram and Bishop
Posted: Dec 14, 2012 2:53 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

GS Chandy Posted: Dec 14, 2012 6:58 AM

>I spent a good bit of time on reading that document.
>The prose is well-nigh unreadable.

You meant to write, "the prose is well-nigh unreadable by me."

While I expressed some quibbles over Wayne's strategy, I had no trouble reading his article. Which brings us back to the question you have been dodging. Would the application of OPMS help you to understand Wayne's writing? My writing? Just about everybody else's writing? All of which you seem to have considerable trouble with.

No representation without taxation.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.